Content Frame
Skip Breadcrumb Navigation
Home  arrow Student Resources  arrow Online Reader  arrow List of All Readings  arrow Debunking Derivatives Delirium

Debunking Derivatives Delirium

"Debunking Derivatives Delirium" describes the role of large banks in interest-rate swaps and argues that worries about banks' increasing use of derivatives are misplaced because interest-rate swaps and other derivatives have made banks more, rather than less, stable.

  1. Define the following terms used in the reading:
    1. over-the-counter derivatives
    2. notional value
    3. credit exposure
    4. dealer bank
    5. capital

  2. Is it appropriate to use the notional value of derivatives to measure the risk to which banks are subject? Why? How large is the credit exposure of the 10 banks that hold the majority of derivatives in the U.S. banking system?

  3. What is an interest-rate swap? How does such a swap typically work? Who might the parties to the swap be, in addition to the dealer bank?

  4. Has the growth in the use of derivatives made banks more stable and less risky, or the opposite? Discuss. How do the authors respond? What evidence do they cite to support their view?

Source: "Debunking Derivatives Delirium." Jeffery W. Gunther and Thomas F. Siems, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas Southwest Economy, March/April 2003, pp. 1, 5-9.





Pearson Copyright © 1995 - 2010 Pearson Education . All rights reserved. Pearson Addison Wesley is an imprint of Pearson .
Legal Notice | Privacy Policy | Permissions

Return to the Top of this Page